OpenSource - Revision history

Admin at 08:19, 10 March 2017

2017-03-10T08:19:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 10 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without ~~f****ing~~ it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface		Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without flubbing it: https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface

	Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.		Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.

Admin at 20:51, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:51:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 8 June 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|
	An "open mic" doesn't mean you'll hear from all voices, or even the most insightful ones. People need to feel safe.		An "open mic" doesn't mean you'll hear from all voices, or even the most insightful ones. People need to feel safe.

			- [https://twitter.com/ruhbehka/status/738436772582035456 @ruhbeka]
	}}		}}

Line 20:		Line 22:
	Solicit more feedback. You don’t have to agree, but you need to acknowledge that their voices were heard.		Solicit more feedback. You don’t have to agree, but you need to acknowledge that their voices were heard.

	- [https://twitter.com/davidegts/status/738439761237553152~~?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw~~ @davidegts]		- [https://twitter.com/davidegts/status/738439761237553152 @davidegts]
	}}		}}

Line 26:		Line 28:
	Will reachout for at least one other opinion before going down a particular path.		Will reachout for at least one other opinion before going down a particular path.

	- [https://twitter.com/NadhanEG/status/738440148296294400~~?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw~~ @nadhaneg]		- [https://twitter.com/NadhanEG/status/738440148296294400 @nadhaneg]
	}}		}}

Admin at 20:50, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:50:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 8 June 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|
	An "open mic" doesn't mean you'll hear from all voices, or even the most insightful ones. People need to feel safe.		An "open mic" doesn't mean you'll hear from all voices, or even the most insightful ones. People need to feel safe.

	~~- [https://twitter.com/ruhbehka/status/738436772582035456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @ruhbeka]~~
	}}		}}

Admin at 20:50, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:50:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 8 June 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.		Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.

	~~{{Quote\|~~
	Probably the biggest mistake we see organizations make when setting up open, collaborative projects (and one of the biggest reasons executives give for not employing more open practices) is that they mistakenly assume that an open project has to be managed as a democracy.

	~~- [https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface Chris Grams, OpenSource.com]~~
	}}

	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|

Admin at 20:50, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 8 June 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.		Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.

			{{Quote\|
			Probably the biggest mistake we see organizations make when setting up open, collaborative projects (and one of the biggest reasons executives give for not employing more open practices) is that they mistakenly assume that an open project has to be managed as a democracy.

			- [https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface Chris Grams, OpenSource.com]
			}}

	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|

Admin at 20:32, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:32:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 8 June 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The meritocracy comes in when it is time to synthesize the input into a final product. The people making the decision should be experienced professionals. Credit should be given where credit is due.		The meritocracy comes in when it is time to synthesize the input into a final product. The people making the decision should be experienced professionals. Credit should be given where credit is due.


	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|
Line 19:		Line 18:
	- [https://twitter.com/ruhbehka/status/738436772582035456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @ruhbeka]		- [https://twitter.com/ruhbehka/status/738436772582035456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @ruhbeka]
	}}		}}


	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|
Line 25:		Line 23:

	- [https://twitter.com/davidegts/status/738439761237553152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @davidegts]		- [https://twitter.com/davidegts/status/738439761237553152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @davidegts]
			}}

			{{Quote\|
			Will reachout for at least one other opinion before going down a particular path.

			- [https://twitter.com/NadhanEG/status/738440148296294400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @nadhaneg]
	}}		}}

Admin at 20:31, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:31:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 8 June 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The meritocracy comes in when it is time to synthesize the input into a final product. The people making the decision should be experienced professionals. Credit should be given where credit is due.		The meritocracy comes in when it is time to synthesize the input into a final product. The people making the decision should be experienced professionals. Credit should be given where credit is due.


			{{Quote\|
			An "open mic" doesn't mean you'll hear from all voices, or even the most insightful ones. People need to feel safe.

			- [https://twitter.com/ruhbehka/status/738436772582035456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @ruhbeka]
			}}


			{{Quote\|
			Solicit more feedback. You don’t have to agree, but you need to acknowledge that their voices were heard.

			- [https://twitter.com/davidegts/status/738439761237553152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw @davidegts]
			}}

Admin at 20:12, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:12:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 8 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without f****ing it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface		Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without f****ing it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface

			Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is an example.

	{{Quote\|		{{Quote\|
Line 7:		Line 9:
	}}		}}

	~~Clearly~~, the ~~"Boaty McBoatface" situation~~ of the ~~British National Environment Research Council~~ is ~~one of these mistakes~~. ~~[http://www~~.~~businessinsider~~.~~com/the-5-most-entertaining-crowdsourcing-disasters-2009-9?op=1 Another link with examples]~~.		The suggestion, instead, is not to give people the option to vote on a final product (like, uh, picking a President). Instead, ask for their input at the beginning of the entire process, ask questions about what they see, what they want, what defines success, how to achieve it. The key is to give people the ability to provide inspiration and input, but not make any final decisions.

			The meritocracy comes in when it is time to synthesize the input into a final product. The people making the decision should be experienced professionals. Credit should be given where credit is due.

Admin at 20:09, 8 June 2016

2016-06-08T20:09:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 8 June 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	}}		}}

	Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is one of these mistakes.		Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is one of these mistakes. [http://www.businessinsider.com/the-5-most-entertaining-crowdsourcing-disasters-2009-9?op=1 Another link with examples].

Admin: Created page with "Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without f****ing it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/..."

2016-06-08T20:06:38Z

Created page with "Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without f****ing it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/..."

New page

Article on avoiding "Brandy McBrandface," and how to accomplish inclusiveness and openness in an organization without f****ing it up: https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface

{{Quote|
Probably the biggest mistake we see organizations make when setting up open, collaborative projects (and one of the biggest reasons executives give for not employing more open practices) is that they mistakenly assume that an open project has to be managed as a democracy.

- [https://opensource.com/open-organization/16/6/open-brand-journey-can-help-you-avoid-brandymcbrandface Chris Grams, OpenSource.com]
}}

Clearly, the "Boaty McBoatface" situation of the British National Environment Research Council is one of these mistakes.