Wireless Cracking - Revision history

Admin: /* Part 1: Extracting Passwords */

2015-08-21T17:22:02Z

Part 1: Extracting Passwords

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 21 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	With a plethora of tools, files, and data being generated by wireless sniffing, how do you manage all of your files and options?		With a plethora of tools, files, and data being generated by wireless sniffing, how do you manage all of your files and options?

	=~~Part 1:~~ Extracting Passwords=		=Extracting Passwords=

	The workflow for extracting passwords:		The workflow for extracting passwords:

	Airdump to monitor, Python to extract data, Python to create attack scripts, Python to process cap files		Airdump to monitor, Python to extract data, Python to create attack scripts, Python to process cap files

			or,

			Besside to vacuum handshakes and put them into one cap file, Besside log to tell you what's in there

	=Part 2: Cracking Passwords=		=Part 2: Cracking Passwords=

2015-08-21T08:07:12Z

The Outcome

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 21 August 2015
Line 105:		Line 105:
	==The Outcome==		==The Outcome==

	The outcome is~~, the~~ best approach is to use John the Ripper to feed passwords to Aircrack.		The outcome is: USE AIRCRACK.

			The best approach is to use John the Ripper to feed passwords to Aircrack.

	The next best alternative is to use John the Ripper alone, although it is slightly slower than Aircrack.		The next best alternative is to use John the Ripper alone, although it is slightly slower than Aircrack.

2015-08-21T08:06:39Z

Other Tools

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 21 August 2015
Line 103:		Line 103:
	Pyrit on a GPU can run about 100x faster, or on the order of 100,000-300,000 keys per second. That's roughly equivalent to cutting a year's worth of work down into a day.		Pyrit on a GPU can run about 100x faster, or on the order of 100,000-300,000 keys per second. That's roughly equivalent to cutting a year's worth of work down into a day.

			==The Outcome==

			The outcome is, the best approach is to use John the Ripper to feed passwords to Aircrack.

			The next best alternative is to use John the Ripper alone, although it is slightly slower than Aircrack.

			You don't want to use Cowpatty unless you can improve its key testing rate by using rainbow tables and hash lookup functions.

2015-08-21T08:05:04Z

Other Tools

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 21 August 2015
Line 101:		Line 101:
	==Other Tools==		==Other Tools==

	Pyrit on a GPU can run about 100x faster, or on the order of 100,000-~~200~~,000 keys per second.		Pyrit on a GPU can run about 100x faster, or on the order of 100,000-300,000 keys per second. That's roughly equivalent to cutting a year's worth of work down into a day.

2015-08-21T08:04:34Z

Benchmarking John the Ripper

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 21 August 2015
Line 98:		Line 98:

	See [[John the Ripper/Benchmarking]]		See [[John the Ripper/Benchmarking]]

			==Other Tools==

			Pyrit on a GPU can run about 100x faster, or on the order of 100,000-200,000 keys per second.

2015-08-21T08:04:02Z

Benchmarking Aircrack

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 21 August 2015
Line 82:		Line 82:

	==Benchmarking Aircrack==		==Benchmarking Aircrack==

			Aircrack clocks in as the fastest cracking tool, at 1200 keys per second.

	See [[Aircrack/Benchmarking]]		See [[Aircrack/Benchmarking]]

2015-08-21T08:03:40Z

Benchmarking Cowpatty

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 21 August 2015
Line 86:		Line 86:

	==Benchmarking Cowpatty==		==Benchmarking Cowpatty==

			Cowpatty cracks at a rate of about 250 keys per second. It's the slowest of the bunch.

	See [[Cowpatty/Benchmarking]]		See [[Cowpatty/Benchmarking]]

2015-08-21T08:03:20Z

Benchmarking John the Ripper

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 21 August 2015
Line 90:		Line 90:

	==Benchmarking John the Ripper==		==Benchmarking John the Ripper==

			John the Ripper cracks at a rate of about 1,000 keys per second.

	See [[John the Ripper/Benchmarking]]		See [[John the Ripper/Benchmarking]]

2015-08-21T07:34:13Z

Part 2: Cracking Passwords

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 21 August 2015
Line 73:		Line 73:

	Pyrit is for cracking passwords using the GPU.		Pyrit is for cracking passwords using the GPU.


			=Picking Your Cracking Tool=

			Which tool should you use? Whichever one is fastest, of course.

			You might want to test them all out to see how fast they operate.

			==Benchmarking Aircrack==

			See [[Aircrack/Benchmarking]]

			==Benchmarking Cowpatty==

			See [[Cowpatty/Benchmarking]]

			==Benchmarking John the Ripper==

			See [[John the Ripper/Benchmarking]]

2015-08-21T07:29:35Z

Cowpatty + John the Ripper

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 21 August 2015
Line 66:		Line 66:
	* Create a list of router ESSIDs whose handshakes are contained in those cap files		* Create a list of router ESSIDs whose handshakes are contained in those cap files
	* Use Python to loop over each of these items and generate a john/cowpatty command		* Use Python to loop over each of these items and generate a john/cowpatty command


			==Pyrit==

			Oh yeah. Did we cover [[Pyrit]] yet?

			Pyrit is for cracking passwords using the GPU.