From charlesreid1

 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=What To Cover=


To what end - what are your objectives as a teacher? foster critical thinking, facilitate acquisition of life-long learning skills, prepare students to function effectively in information economy, develop problem-solving skills, your role in orienting students toward discipline, where your responsibilities end and their responsibilities begin
To what end - what are your objectives as a teacher? foster critical thinking, facilitate acquisition of life-long learning skills, prepare students to function effectively in information economy, develop problem-solving skills, your role in orienting students toward discipline, where your responsibilities end and their responsibilities begin
Line 7: Line 8:


Why teaching?
Why teaching?


=Draft=
=Draft=
Line 21: Line 21:
For students to absorb a subject, for them to internalize it, requires that it become more than simply a set of definitions, facts, information, and equations. The subject matter must come alive and capture the learner's attention. There are many, many ways for that to happen (it might be a graph that makes concepts "click," or tying an abstract concept into baking, or changing the parameters on a computer program), but students often lead into new fields with intuitive and visual thinking, so that they can build up their mental models and navigate unfamiliar topics. Appealing to these types of thinking when introducing new STEM topics appeals to a wide array of students with a range of learning styles.  
For students to absorb a subject, for them to internalize it, requires that it become more than simply a set of definitions, facts, information, and equations. The subject matter must come alive and capture the learner's attention. There are many, many ways for that to happen (it might be a graph that makes concepts "click," or tying an abstract concept into baking, or changing the parameters on a computer program), but students often lead into new fields with intuitive and visual thinking, so that they can build up their mental models and navigate unfamiliar topics. Appealing to these types of thinking when introducing new STEM topics appeals to a wide array of students with a range of learning styles.  


Mental models are the fundamental building bricks of engineering. Therefore, the aim in all of this is to develop students' abilities to build and improve their own mental models
Mental models are the fundamental building bricks of engineering. The aim of appealing to intuition and visual thinking is to develop students' abilities to build and improve their own mental models. Having an intuitive understanding of quadrature is a far more useful skill than memorizing the coefficients for Simpson's Rule. As mentioned above, there are many different ways for the subject matter to come alive. This means that instructors should use many different media for instruction - including, most importantly, facilitating discussion among students, to give them a chance to explain the concepts themselves.
 
=Notes=
 
I have come to understand something, over the years, as a visual learner in an engineering field. I have learned the importance of diverse perspectives in the learning process. I have been witness to many students' struggles in engineering fields (and experienced them as a student myself), and I can tell you that many of the struggles in engineering education boil down to problems of perspective. This can take different forms: a student might expect problems within a certain context, and be given problems in a totally different one. A teacher might use highly technical jargon that the student doesn't understand. The primary medium of communication used by a teacher might be a chalkboard, written words, and spoken words, while the primary medium of learning of a student might be visual, concrete, and hands-on.
 
Unfortunately, the perspective problem has a negative feedback component
 
Often, a student is not given the proper context for a problem, or does not have enough of their perspectives in common with a. This can take different forms - the teacher might use highly technical jargon that the student doesn't understand
 
, the teacher uses highly technical jargon the student doesn't understand, the primary communication mediums are chalkboards, written words, and spoken words, all unappealing to an intuitive or visual thinker, all making the transfer of knowledge difficult.
 
 
 
 
 
With over a decade of experience as a student, teacher, and professional in an engineering field, I can tell you exactly why STEM fields are suffering from a lack of diversity.
 
It has a lot to do with perspective
 
I've witnessed the struggles of many students in engineering fields. My own entry into the field was no cakewalk - I've also experienced them myself. The origin of so many of these struggles is a mismatch of teaching and learning styles.


Many of these struggles boil down to perspective.  
No STEM education is complete without learning programming. But it isn't just because any job in STEM will require programming skills. It's because programming gives students a chance to run very complicated thought experiments: to implement assumptions, and explore the consequences. This provides a versatile and powerful tool to develop intuition for just about anything. I think of programming as the roll of duct tape you can use to fix any mental model.


Having spent nearly two decades as a student, teacher, and professional in a technical engineering field, I can tell you exactly why STEM fields are suffering from a lack of diversity. And the problem boils down to perspective.
==To What Degree==


part of the process of becoming an expert in a subject is to absorb the language that surrounds that subject. Often, it is deep technical jargon that makes no sense to the uninitiated. As a person's expertise becomes deeper, it becomes more difficult to articulate and communicate mental models without the use of technical jargon.  
Measuring the true effectiveness of a teaching approach can require a lot of data - enough to see the long-term effects of a teaching approach. But information about the short-term effects of a teaching approach can be just as useful. I ask for feedback frequently and incorporate it into a continual improvement of my teaching process. I ensure that issues are addressed early on. Every classroom and every group of students is different, and requires a tailored approach - and teaching students using the same canned lecture materials year after year won't do anything to lower barriers around STEM or draw in non-traditional students. Feedback is a critical part of how I teach.


This leaves students who do not speak the same language without a way to reason through the subject. The dissonance between instructor and student
==Why==


(Community College)


I have seen, more times than I can count, golden opportunities to spark an interest in groups underrepresented in STEM education, or in groups of kids who haven't yet decided what they want to be when they grow up, who don't yet know what is possible in their lives. The person standing in front of that group has the potential to launch each and every one of them on a trajectory toward science and engineering. And, heartbreakingly, I have seen nearly as many opportunities badly fumbled and completely blown, often by people who take for granted that a spark of interest and a connection to the topic has already happened. (Think of a scientist standing in front of a giant Tesla coil, lecturing a group of kindergartners on Ohm's Law instead of just turning the damn thing on!)


Solving the problem of lack of diversity in STEM fields isn't complicated - it just requires gentler introductions and an appeal to more universal methods of learning and thinking, like appealing to intuition and the visual part of the brain. I am passionate about sparking people's interest in STEM fields, and I want to do my part to solve this problem!


Negative feedback loop of context deeper into field, losing contact with everyone else
=Notes Outline=


Philosophy of teaching
Philosophy of teaching

Latest revision as of 23:10, 14 August 2015

What To Cover

To what end - what are your objectives as a teacher? foster critical thinking, facilitate acquisition of life-long learning skills, prepare students to function effectively in information economy, develop problem-solving skills, your role in orienting students toward discipline, where your responsibilities end and their responsibilities begin

By what means - methods, learning theory, cognitive development, mental models, resources, methods, kinds of classes

To what degree - how do you intend to measure effectiveness of objectives and methods outlined? student learning, student outcomes should reflect effort. student evaluations, assessment methods, feedback.

Why teaching?

Draft

To What End

After nearly a decade as a student, a teacher, and a professional in an engineering field, I have witnessed many of the struggles that people face when trying to understand topics in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). I've seen much of it come about because non-traditional learning styles clash with traditional education methods, or because different perspectives are mistaken for incompetence. Sometimes students never get the chance to apply their creativity and skills to a field because they experience these struggles right out of the gate. As a visual learner, I've experienced these struggles myself.

My aim is to teach STEM fields in a way that appeals to intuition and visual thinking, to help students to develop intuition and mental models about a subject, to be able to reason their way through subject matter. This intuitive approach can help make STEM fields more accessible to students previously marginalized in STEM fields: females, minorities, and persons with disabilities, not to mention the wide range of different thinking and learning styles that benefit from everyone having a common context and learning as much from each other as from an instructor.

By What Means

For students to absorb a subject, for them to internalize it, requires that it become more than simply a set of definitions, facts, information, and equations. The subject matter must come alive and capture the learner's attention. There are many, many ways for that to happen (it might be a graph that makes concepts "click," or tying an abstract concept into baking, or changing the parameters on a computer program), but students often lead into new fields with intuitive and visual thinking, so that they can build up their mental models and navigate unfamiliar topics. Appealing to these types of thinking when introducing new STEM topics appeals to a wide array of students with a range of learning styles.

Mental models are the fundamental building bricks of engineering. The aim of appealing to intuition and visual thinking is to develop students' abilities to build and improve their own mental models. Having an intuitive understanding of quadrature is a far more useful skill than memorizing the coefficients for Simpson's Rule. As mentioned above, there are many different ways for the subject matter to come alive. This means that instructors should use many different media for instruction - including, most importantly, facilitating discussion among students, to give them a chance to explain the concepts themselves.

No STEM education is complete without learning programming. But it isn't just because any job in STEM will require programming skills. It's because programming gives students a chance to run very complicated thought experiments: to implement assumptions, and explore the consequences. This provides a versatile and powerful tool to develop intuition for just about anything. I think of programming as the roll of duct tape you can use to fix any mental model.

To What Degree

Measuring the true effectiveness of a teaching approach can require a lot of data - enough to see the long-term effects of a teaching approach. But information about the short-term effects of a teaching approach can be just as useful. I ask for feedback frequently and incorporate it into a continual improvement of my teaching process. I ensure that issues are addressed early on. Every classroom and every group of students is different, and requires a tailored approach - and teaching students using the same canned lecture materials year after year won't do anything to lower barriers around STEM or draw in non-traditional students. Feedback is a critical part of how I teach.

Why

(Community College)

I have seen, more times than I can count, golden opportunities to spark an interest in groups underrepresented in STEM education, or in groups of kids who haven't yet decided what they want to be when they grow up, who don't yet know what is possible in their lives. The person standing in front of that group has the potential to launch each and every one of them on a trajectory toward science and engineering. And, heartbreakingly, I have seen nearly as many opportunities badly fumbled and completely blown, often by people who take for granted that a spark of interest and a connection to the topic has already happened. (Think of a scientist standing in front of a giant Tesla coil, lecturing a group of kindergartners on Ohm's Law instead of just turning the damn thing on!)

Solving the problem of lack of diversity in STEM fields isn't complicated - it just requires gentler introductions and an appeal to more universal methods of learning and thinking, like appealing to intuition and the visual part of the brain. I am passionate about sparking people's interest in STEM fields, and I want to do my part to solve this problem!

Notes Outline

Philosophy of teaching

  • STEm require up front explanation of principles in myriad ways
  • abstractions to tackle complicated subjects
  • intuit their way around new ideas

Teaching style

  • tackle complicated subjects
  • distill very large body of materials into essentials
  • intuitive way, visual abstractions, intuition pumps

The bigger picture

  • This is about more than a "bag of tricks"
  • This is about solving, one person at a time, the problem of diversity in technology
  • Negative feedback loop, as get deeper into technical field, losing touch with context, fewer can follow, self-selective process
  • Process of engineering education is the process of teaching students how to think critically, how to observe and analyze, how to build mental models.