Algorithms/Search: Difference between revisions
From charlesreid1
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
high - (mid+1) + 1 = high - floor( \dfrac{low + high}{2} \leq \dfrac{high - low + 1}{2} | high - (mid+1) + 1 = high - floor( \dfrac{low + high}{2} ) \leq \dfrac{high - low + 1}{2} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Initially, n candidates; next call, n/2 candidates; next call, n/4 candidates; etc. The maximum number of recursive calls is the smallest integer r such that: | |||
<math> | |||
\dfrac{n}{2^r} < 1 | |||
</math> | |||
In other words, <math>r > \log{(n)}</math> | |||
Thus, we have | |||
<math> | |||
r = floor( \log{(n)} ) + 1 | |||
</math> | |||
which implies that binary search runs in O(log N) time. | |||
Revision as of 00:40, 12 July 2017
Notes
Goodrich chapter 4
Recursion: binary search analysis.
Proposition: The binary search algorithm runs in O(log n) time for a sorted sequence with n elements.
Justification: To prove this claim, a crucial fact is that within each recursive call the number of candidate entries still to be searched is given by the value
high - low + 1
Moreover, the number of remaining candidates is reduced by at least one half with each recursive call. Specifically, from the definition of mid, the number of remaining candidates is either
$ (mid - 1) - low + 1 = floor( \dfrac{low+high}{2} ) - low \leq \dfrac{high - low + 1}{2} $
or,
$ high - (mid+1) + 1 = high - floor( \dfrac{low + high}{2} ) \leq \dfrac{high - low + 1}{2} $
Initially, n candidates; next call, n/2 candidates; next call, n/4 candidates; etc. The maximum number of recursive calls is the smallest integer r such that:
$ \dfrac{n}{2^r} < 1 $
In other words, $ r > \log{(n)} $
Thus, we have
$ r = floor( \log{(n)} ) + 1 $
which implies that binary search runs in O(log N) time.