10 Best Practices for Software Engineering: Difference between revisions
From charlesreid1
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Also see: [[NASA 10 Best Practices for Software Engineering]] | |||
=Heroux and Willenbring's 10 Best Practices= | =Heroux and Willenbring's 10 Best Practices= | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 4 January 2018
Also see: NASA 10 Best Practices for Software Engineering
Heroux and Willenbring's 10 Best Practices
In a draft paper called Barely Sufficient Software Engineering (pdf file) that I find myself returning to again and again as a computational chemical engineer, Michael Heroux and James Willenbring, both of Sandia National Laboratories, wrote up 10 (actually, 11) guidelines for writing scientific code that is high quality and encourages collaboration.
They are:
0. Manage your source (the basics)
1. Use issue-tracking software for requirements, features, and bugs
2. Manage your source (beyond the basics)
3. Use mailing lists to communicate
4. Use checklists for repeated processes
5. Create barely sufficient, source-centric documentation
6. Use configuration management tools
7. Write tests first, run them often
8. Program tough stuff together
9. Use a formal release process
10. Perform continual process improvement
An Abbreviated Version
Issue tracking
Version control
Mailing list
Checklists! Checklists!
Self documenting
Configuration management
Test driven
Pair programming
Formal release
Continuous improvement
Full
See Also: The Cathedral and the Bazaar (19 best practices for creating open-source software)
Following Heroux and Willenbring's paper (http://www.sandia.gov/~maherou/docs/BarelySufficientSoftwareEngineering.pdf), here are 10 "best practices" for software engineering:
1 Issue-tracking software for requirements, features, and bugs
2 Manage source: beyond the basics
3 Use mailing lists to communicate
4 Use checklists for repeated processes
5 Barely-sufficient, source-centric documentation
6 Configuration management tools
7 Write tests first, run them often
8 Program tough stuff together
9 Use formal release process
10 Continuous process improvement